Right to a Fair Hearing, Statutory Interpretation and Limitation Periods

Andrew Casey v Richard Luke Alcock [2009] ACTCA 1 (23 January 2009)

The ACT Court of Appeal has indicated that the UK's Ghaidan approach to legislative construction - which allows a court to depart from the unambiguous meaning of the legislation where necessary to give effect to a designated purpose - does not necessarily apply under the Legislation Act 2001 (ACT) or Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) ('HR Act (ACT)').

Read More
Balancing the Right to a Fair Hearing with the Protection of Vulnerable Persons

Wright & Ors v Secretary of State for Health & Anor [2009] UKHL 3 (21 January 2009)

The House of Lords has recently issued a declaration of incompatibly under the Human Rights Act 1998 (UK) ('HR Act') in relation to the Care Standards Act 2000 (UK) ('Act').  The House of Lords held that the Act may irreparably damage the employment or employment prospects of persons suspected of posing a risk of harm to vulnerable adults.  It is therefore incompatible with the right to a fair hearing and the right to respect for private and family life.

Read More
Reliance on Witness Statement where Cross-Examination not Available may Violate Right to a Fair Hearing

Al-Khawaja and Tahery v United Kingdom [2009] ECHR 26766/05 (20 January 2009)

The European Court of Human Rights has held that allowing a witness statement to be admitted as evidence where the witness is not available for cross examination and that evidence is the sole or decisive basis for convicting the accused violates the right to a fair trial provided in arts 6 § 1 and 6 § 3(d) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Read More
Is Refusal to Attend a Funeral a Breach of the Right to a Private and Family Life for Prisoners?

Czarnowski v Poland [2009] ECHR 28586/035 (20 January 2009)

The Applicant, Mr Edward Czarnowski, lodged an application with the European Court of Human Rights against Poland for breach of art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.  Art 8 provides:

'Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life...There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.'

Read More
Balancing Freedom of Expression and the Right to Privacy

Erdoğan v Turkey [2009] ECHR 39656/03 (13 January 2009)

The European Court of Human Rights recently found that the Government of Turkey, having ordered lawyer Ayhan Erdoğan to pay compensation for remarks that he made against a public figure during court proceedings, had breached Mr Erdoğan's right to freedom of speech in violation of art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Article 10 of the Convention guarantees the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to 'impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers' (art 10(1)), subject to such restrictions and penalties as are 'prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society… for the protection of the reputation or rights of others' (art 10(2)).

Read More